|
Antimatter: ←
Anti-matter - in a general sense - can with this dimension
model be interpreted as one of the two complementary structures
on each level where matter is gradually defined.
- From a general - E to E as = - mc2 in relation
to + E to E as + mc2
- FA-force and FM-force
in relation to FG and FE-forces
(or vice versa).
- Vacant Space in relation to Mass.
- Antimatter as positrons - in relation to electrons.
- Also then on a secondary level: Electrons in our matter
in relation to protons..
Dirac's "hole theory" is since long ago a fundamental
part of physics (in this model fully adopted of course), and
in later days also the kind of energy and force of Vacant
Space. Generally the anti-matter could appear as (-)-energies
relative to matter as (+)-energy, as "quanta" or
factors with opposite signs, of more or less particularized
character.
This view on "antimatter" or anti-"matter"
seems in most (?) cases carried through today by physicists.
(Cf. quarks baptized"up-" and "down"-quarks.)
Arguments for not imagining separate worlds of anti-matter:
When many thinkers in physics have wanted to believe in worlds
of anti-matter in cosmos, it could be a false conclusion
from mathematics building on symmetry-concepts, which have
a limited validity.
Primary we have that the starting point in this dimension
model in a 5th d-degree, polarized in center and anticenter,
already implies an asymmetry. If two material worlds should
arise in opposite space quadrants of a coordinate system so
to say, which world should get the center (the rose on the
tart)?
As written in the chapter about matter, one can take the
concept of "strangeness" from elementary-particle
physics and interpret it as center-displacement through a
dimension or level chain.
We can in that case guess that matter
is matter just in force of its "strangeness",
in force of its center displacement and relative one-way direction.
(If we should imagine a white square divided by a straight
line, we have two "mirror worlds". If we then make
a little inward bend of the line into one of the two fields,
we get an irregularity, a "matrix-relation", and
no mirror worlds with the line as a mirror.
By making two inward bends on the line, in opposite directions,
we get a "matrix-relation" in "real time",
or two mirror worlds with a mutual phase displacement.
(One turned through a 3rd dimension in that case). (Which
we perhaps have? The bends seen as a "jumping" center,
as in waves with maxima and minima (tangent +/- infinity).
But separated worlds in cosmos of "maxima and minima"
become a nonsense.)
Anti-matter then should be seen as built-in everywhere
in our world, - in the same way as "the infinity"
or "the eternity" as 00-pole is built-in.
It should be possible to find it both inside
and outside matter and it should constitute another relation
between outwards and inwards directions.
- In level step 4 →3, the
field level, fields with opposite sign to those underlying
matter gets the role of anti-matter, as outward acceleration
is a counterforce to gravitation.
- In level step 3 →2 then
we can see the vacant space as the real so called anti-matter,
negative protons for instance.
- Later, in level step 2 →1,
we should identify proton and electron as each other's anti-matter
(antiparticles) - among several anti-relations created with
the growing complexity. So, according to Gamow,
is the energy of the electron in an atom, if its kinetic energy
is included, about the same as that of the proton.
Another argument against separate anti-matter worlds could
possibly be formulated like this:
If we have as starting point an Entirety
of all potential energy which could be designated E0 or E
= +/- mc2, and imagine this energy transformed
into matter and anti-matter, this should need to occur in
different parts of Universe from the start or in that way
that the opposite masses flew apart of some reason, so that
they couldn´t annihilate one another. - But this presupposes
either that there already exists a "space" which
could denote "in different quarters", or a kinetic
energy to use for the flying apart.
In short, there wouldn´t remain enough
of he potential energy to create space and vacant space between
the parts of matter, to kinetic energy for motions of material
particles and celestial bodies.
Furthermore, the thought of "flying
apart" totally disagrees with the view on complementary
energy forms - and with the postulates in this model that
inwards and outwards are the fundamental opposites
as far as directions concerns.
Doesn't´t "anti-matter" exist just in
all courses of events between masses of our matter - as processes,
as free energy, as surroundings? (Like cell plasma in relation
to cell nuclei, as environment in relation to individuals.)
Compare that the motion dimension chain is counterdirected
that of the structures, according to the basic postulates
here.
In the last d-degree 0/00 of Motions,
creating relative Distances and Time, one could test
the aspect of seeing these physical concepts as representing
each other's "anti-matter".
(This suggested without more preciseness here.)
Then we can note the fact that there are found antiparticles
in our world, as antiprotons and positrons. Produced and/or
verified. They exist for example as occasionally created positron-electron
pairs. That is not to be wondered at: now we have something
to relate to: the matter. And something to extract from: the
"vacant space" and the mathematics.
If we should imagine that conditions for greater quantities
of material anti-matter existed in our universe, in an ordinary
sense, it should perhaps be in passages or bands between
our galaxies, along "force borders" between
them; antiparticles there could eventually form networks of
motion directions, in principal parallel with the surface
of each celestial body where somebody could be standing waiting
for them?
These bands or passages could then resemble
the field-free regions between two magnetic north-poles, directed
towards each other, and the anti-matter particles would get
very curved and bewildered ramifications or tunnels to find
their way through. (Not very likely.)
Celestial bodies as branch rudiments in tree trunks
More easy to accept - and more in accordance with views of
today - and of the model here - would be the thought that
Vacant Space and its energies is continuously created by a
constantly progressive annihilation between complementary
forces and quanta... (!), and therefore that the cosmic space
is so big!
Compare - on one level - the propagation of light
waves.
(In that case it would have similarities
with the "discrimination" in the nervous system, where
inhibition signals from the brain (as minus 1/2),
for example in the auditory sense, annihilates
or puts out reactions on certain higher / lower
tone frequencies from hearing cells surrounding
a certain group of receptors, whose frequencies
then is accentuated, as central, as centers.)
*
|